McManamon v. Washko
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GANTMAN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellants, Edward L. Washko and Greater Hazleton Health Alliance ask us to determine whether the trial court erred when it denied their post-trial motions for a new trial and/or remittitur of the verdict *1264in this personal injury action. We hold the court properly rejected Appellants’ multiple claims of trial error; the jury instructions on pain and suffering and the verdict slip were appropriate under Pennsylvania law; and the court properly refused to grant remittitur in general or to apply the remittitur provisions of the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. ManivannanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. BullockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. LusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.