Legal Opinion
Cutler v. Bowen
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 6, 1935No. Civ. 9789PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued the defendants Bowen and Bartell in damages for fraud and joined the Fidelity Company as surety on their bond given under the California Real Estate Act. The cause was tried with a jury and plaintiff had a verdict and judgment against the brokers for $2,300 and against the surety for $2,000, which was the full amount of the bond. All the defendants appeal.
Plaintiff was the owner of ranch property near Orland which was subject to three deeds of trust—one a second lien on the east half of the property in the sum of $1900 which was Imown as the “Clark deed”. This property was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Rogers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tufts v. PooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Trupp v. WolffCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Grant v. United States Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Realty Co. of America v. BurtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Blake v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.