Legal Opinion

Tufts v. Poore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 1999No. [No. 99, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants below, Nancy Narcissa Poore Tufts, individually and as executrix of the estate of Pearl Payseur Poore, and William O. Tufts, from a determination by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, upon a verdict of the jury, that the codicil of Pearl Payseur Poore, dated July 3, 1955, was procured by fraud. The proceeding arose upon a caveat instituted in the Orphans’ Court of Prince George’s County by the plaintiffs, James Edward Poore, III, Gerald G. Poore, Walter H. Poore, Elizabeth Gilbert Poore, individually and as mother and next friend to Richard T.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Griffith v. DiffenderfferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Gordon v. BurrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Anders v. AndersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Griffith v. BenzingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Brager v. FriedenwaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Sass v. AndrewCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Levin v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API