Legal Opinion
Adler v. Vision Lab Telecommunications, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2005No. CIV.A. 05-0003(ESH)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
William Adler and five other plaintiffs allege that they received unsolicited and improperly identified faxes from Vision Lab Telecommunications, Inc. and eight other defendants in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 (Counts I and II), and the District of Columbia Consumer Protection and Procedures Act (“DCCPPA”), D.C.Code § 28-3904 (Count III). Plaintiffs also claim that defendants are liable for the common law torts of negligence (Count IV) and invasion of privacy (Count V). Defendants have moved for judgment…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ronald T. Phillips v. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- International Science & Technology Institute, Incorporated v. Inacom Communications, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Howard v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- In Re Swine Flu Immunization Products Liability Litigation. Linda Kenneda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kopff v. BattagliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Ihebereme v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Sloan Ex Rel. Juergens v. Urban Title Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- McMullen v. Synchrony BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.