Legal Opinion

Howard v. Riggs National Bank

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1981No. 79-1108PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Associate Judge:

Appellant brought suit in the Superior Court charging appellee The Riggs National Bank (Riggs) with (1) common-law fraudulent misrepresentation, and (2) alleged violations of the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act, D.C.Code 1978 Supp., Title 28 App., § 5. Appellant challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Riggs. We affirm.

I

Viewed in the light most favorable to appellant, the record reveals the following facts. 1

In early April of 1978, appellant contacted Louise Kelly, then a loan officer at the Watergate branch of Riggs,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Campos-SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Kopff v. BattagliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Schiff v. American Ass'n of Retired PersonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Thorsten P. Sundberg v. TTR Realty, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API