Gilmore v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant Gilmore was convicted of distributing heroin, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1993). On appeal he presents three claims of error. We find all three without merit and affirm the conviction.
I
The government’s evidence showed that Gilmore and his co-defendant, Anthony Hubbard, were arrested by two police officers who had seen them engaged in what appeared to be a drug sale. The officers saw Gilmore hand to Hubbard an object that later turned out to be a brown paper packet containing four ziplock bags of white powder. Hubbard was holding the packet in his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- McGrier v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hinnant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gilmore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997