Scott v. United States

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellants, who are mother and son, were both convicted on three counts of armed robbery, 1 and appellant Phillip Scott was also convicted of carrying a pistol without a license. 2 Phillip Scott now argues that his convictions should be reversed because the trial court refused to admit into evidence certain police reports, because the trial court failed to conduct a sufficient inquiry into his complaints about the performance of his counsel, and because the prosecutor engaged in improper conduct in the course of cross-examining him and in closing argument. Alice Scott…