Legal Opinion
Robinson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 27, 2000No. 95-CF-852, 97-CO-1946 & 95-CF-1128PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
After a jury trial, appellants Flossie N. Robinson and Grady Butler were convicted of distribution of heroin, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541 (1998). 1 Both filed a timely notice of appeal, challenging various rulings of the trial court. In addition, Robinson filed a D.C.Code § 23-110 (1996) motion, asserting ineffectiveness of trial counsel. The motion was denied, and Robinson filed a timely appeal. We affirm the convictions of Robinson and Butler, and the trial court’s denial of Robinson’s § 23-110 motion. However, we remand Butler’s case to the trial court for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Winters v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- King v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- District of Columbia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Tony Armstrong & Floyd Joiner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Spencer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.