Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 1997No. 93-CF-979PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
In a prior opinion, this court affirmed appellant Gilmore’s conviction of distribution of heroin and rejected his claim that his mandatory minimum sentence was improperly enhanced under D.C.Code § 33-541(c)(l)(A-l) (1993) (repealed 1995). 1 Gilmore v. United States, 648 A.2d 944 (D.C.1994) (“Gilmore I ”). We later granted rehearing on a single issue and asked the parties and amicus curiae to file supplemental briefs addressing the effect on this case, if any, of a recently discovered discrepancy between the enrolled original and the codified version of D.C.Code §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mulky v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. HatchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- J.P. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Young v. U-Haul Co. of D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.