Legal Opinion

Hinnant v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1987No. 85-1157PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of possession of heroin with intent to distribute it, carrying a pistol without a license, possession of an unregistered firearm, and possession of unregistered ammunition. 1 Appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony on heroin dealing, in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, and in giving a missing witness instruction. We find no reversible error and affirm all four convictions.

I

Appellant was arrested after a police officer saw him place a revolver in the waistband of his trousers.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. William A. Raper, United States of America v. Eli B. Childs, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. James GoodingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. VilalastraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. OdomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API