Legal Opinion

Murray v. Hamot Medical Center

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1993No. 02016PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge.

The issues raised in this appeal concern the proper application of the statute of limitations for personal injury arising out of the contraction of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), which causes Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS).

The circumstances of this case are tragic, indeed. In June, 1985, the decedent, Perry Murray, was admitted to Hamot Medical Center in Erie, Pennsylvania, for open heart surgery. During surgery, Mr. Murray required a blood transfusion, which his doctors administered. In June of 1987, Hamot Medical Center officials learned that the donor of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Wilson v. El-DaiefSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. White v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Amarhanov v. FasselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Casarez v. NME Hospitals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API