Legal Opinion

Amarhanov v. Fassel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1995No. 02175PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

Appellants, George Amarhanov and Patricia Amarhanov, his wife, appeal from the October 31, 1994 entry of summary judgment in favor of appellees. Summary judgment was entered on the basis that appellants’ negligence claim failed to present genuine issues as to duty and causation.

The instant action arose on the night of February 21, 1990 when appellant/George Amarhanov (hereinafter “appellant”) was struck by an automobile driven by defendant Robert J. Fassel. 1 At the time of the accident, appellant was standing on the edge of a dumpster located along the curb in front of 2124…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Dudley v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. McCain v. PennbankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Samarin v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Burman v. Golay and Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Huddleston v. Infertility Center of America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Herczeg v. Hampton Township Municipal AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Beitler v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Berenato v. Seneca Speciality Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API