Legal Opinion
Cathcart v. Keene Industrial Insulation
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 13, 1984No. 1377PublishedCited by 246 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*129HESTER, Judge:
Appellants, David and Thelma Cathcart, brought suit on February 6, 1976, at No. 923 February Term, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 1976 action) against the following thirty-one defendants (listed alphabetically), by filing a Writ of Summons in Trespass: Amatex Corp.; American Textile; Asbestos Textile Corp.; Baldwin Hill; Benjamin Foster Div. of Amchem Products, Inc.; Carey; Carolina Narrow Fabric Co.; Certain-Teed Products Corp.; Delaware Asbestos and Rubber Co.; Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.; Eastern Refractory, Inc.; Ehret; Ehret Baldwin Hill; Forty-Eight Insulation…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by246 opinions
- Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Denise Bohus v. Stanley A. BeloffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Danziger & De Llano LLP v. Morgan Verkamp LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.