Legal Opinion

Lee v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1927No. 2859PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Certain edible seeds were imported by appellants at the port of San Francisco, and in one entry (protest 4544-G) were classified for duty as beans at 2 cents per pound under paragraph 5 of the emergency tariff act. They were claimed to be dutiable under paragraph 209 of the tariff act of 1913, as “Peas, green or dried,” at 10 cents per bushel of 60 pounds. In another entry (protest 22666-G) they were assessed for duty at the rate of 1% cents per pound under paragraph 763 of the Tariff Act of 1922 as “ Beans not specially provided for, * * * dried,” and were claimed to be dutiable under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morse Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Rockhill & VietorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. United States v. ReddenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Happel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. United States v. Sandoz Chemical WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Mader v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API