United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 43356. ¡Oral argument Eeb. 27,1920, by Mr. Baldwin and Mr. Puolchafer.]
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
Jacquard figured cotton cloth in the piece imported at the port of New York was classified by the collector of customs as “Jacquard figured manufactures of cotton,” and was therefore assessed for duty *150at 30 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph. 258 which reads as follows:
258. * * * all other Jacquard figured manufactures of cotton, or of which cotton is the component material of chief value, 30 per centum ad valorem.
The importers protested that the goods were not dutiable as “Jacquard figured manufactures of cotton,” but were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erhardt v. SchroederSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Lahey & DunoanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
- Lord v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. MayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Morse Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Ocean Brokerage Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- United States v. SabinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Luigi Vitelli Elvea, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.