Legal Opinion

United States v. Feld

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 30, 1988No. ACM 26841PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MURDOCK, Judge:

The appellant was found guilty, contrary to his pleas, of wrongful use of cocaine. He was tried by a court with members. The appellant’s assertion that the proceeding in revision which met to resolve an ambiguity in his sentence resulted in an increase in his sentence is without merit.

The sequence of events which led to the asserted error began when the president announced the sentence as follows:

Airman First Class Robert E. Feld, Jr., this court-martial sentences you:

To forfeit $350 of your pay for a period of nine months;

To be reduced to the grade of E-l;

To be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. United States v. RobinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. LiberatorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. RoserU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. DawsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API