United States v. Roser
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WOLD, Senior Judge:
Appellant was tried by a general court-martial with members. Based on a provident plea of guilty, he was convicted of blackmarketing in violation of a general regulation, an offense proscribed by Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892. We have considered the matter briefed by appellate defense counsel and the matters addressed by appellant personally and find them to be without merit.1 We write to correct an apparent misunderstanding of previous published opinions from this court relating to remedies at the trial level in cases…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. GiarratanoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. SouthersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. StokesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. JacksonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. FeldU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. BingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. BriggsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994