Legal Opinion

United States v. Jackson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 29, 1992No. ACMR 9100761PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GRAVELLE, Judge:

Pursuant to mixed pleas, the appellant was found guilty of absence without leave (three specifications), violating general regulations by possessing two military identification cards and by possessing drug paraphernalia, using cocaine, possession of marijuana and cocaine, possession of marijuana and cocaine with intent to distribute, larceny, and making and uttering worthless checks, in violation of Articles 86, 92, 112a, 121, and 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 892, 912a, 921, and 923a (1982 and Supp. V 1987) [hereinafter UCMJ]. A…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Specialist JOSHUA D. CHANDLERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  2. United States v. BrooksArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. JacksonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  5. United States v. ThomasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API