Legal Opinion
Sherrill v. Department of Transportation
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1990No. CV-90-0122-PRPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORCORAN, Justice.
Nancy Jane Sherrill (petitioner) seeks review of a court of appeals decision affirming her license suspension for refusal to successfully complete a blood alcohol test. 164 Ariz. 442, 793 P.2d 1109. The issue presented is whether the Arizona Department of Transportation (DOT) sufficiently established a “refusal” under the implied consent statute, A.R.S. § 28-691, absent any evidence of petitioner’s willful noncooperation. DOT’s finding was based only on an Intoxilyzer reading indicating “deficient sample” and a blood alcohol content (BAC) level above the legal…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Fuenning v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of AppealsArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Zahtila v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Rev.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered PersonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Carrillo v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ClaryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.