Legal Opinion
Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of Appeals
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1990No. CV-89-0304-SA, CV-89-0362-PRPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Big D Construction Corporation (Big D) filed a direct special action petition 1 against the Court of Appeals, Division One, the City of Tempe (Tempe), and Weitz Company, Inc. (Weitz), asking,this court to consider the constitutionality of Arizona’s bid preference statute, A.R.S. § 34-241. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, §§ 5(1) and 5(3) and Rule 8, Ariz.R.P. Spec.Act., 17B A.R.S.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In early 1989, Tempe invited bids for the construction of the National Football League Cardinals Training Facility and Corporate…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Standhardt v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State Compensation Fund v. SymingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.