Legal Opinion
Fuenning v. Superior Court
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1983No. 17049-SAPublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
Petitioner, the defendant below (defendant), brings this special action to contest his conviction under A.R.S. § 28-692(B) for driving “while there is 0.10 per cent or more by weight of alcohol in the ... blood.” Defendant argued that we should accept jurisdiction because he has no remedy by appeal from the superior court for most of the issues argued below (see A.R.S. § 22-371 and Baca v. Don, 130 Ariz. 222, 635 P.2d 510 (App.1981)) and construction of the new drunk-driving law is a matter of statewide concern. The amici claim that the issues presented are matters of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.