Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. Houser

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2010No. CV-09-0285-PRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BALES, Justice.

¶ 1 Under Arizona’s implied consent law, A.R.S. § 28-1321 (Supp.2009), a person arrested for driving under the influence is asked to submit to testing, such as a blood draw, to determine alcohol concentration or drug content. If the arrestee refuses the test — and the statute deems a failure to expressly agree to be a refusal — the arrestee’s license is administratively suspended. We today hold that the statute generally does not authorize law enforcement officers to administer the test without a warrant unless the arrestee expressly agrees to the test.

I

¶ 2 Arizona’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. CocioArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Sherrill v. Department of TransportationArizona Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Hon. butler/tyler B.Arizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State of Arizona v. Francisco L Encinas ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. Don Jacob HavatoneArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  4. SVENDSEN v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. State of Arizona v. Courtney Noelle WeaklandArizona Supreme Court · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API