Carrillo v. Houser
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BALES, Justice.
¶ 1 Under Arizona’s implied consent law, A.R.S. § 28-1321 (Supp.2009), a person arrested for driving under the influence is asked to submit to testing, such as a blood draw, to determine alcohol concentration or drug content. If the arrestee refuses the test — and the statute deems a failure to expressly agree to be a refusal — the arrestee’s license is administratively suspended. We today hold that the statute generally does not authorize law enforcement officers to administer the test without a warrant unless the arrestee expressly agrees to the test.
I
¶ 2 Arizona’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. CocioArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Sherrill v. Department of TransportationArizona Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Hon. butler/tyler B.Arizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Francisco L Encinas ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Don Jacob HavatoneArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- SVENDSEN v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Courtney Noelle WeaklandArizona Supreme Court · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.