Legal Opinion
State v. Nichols
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 14, 1991No. 2 CA-SA 91-0045PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES C. CARRUTH, Superior Court Judge. *
The State of Arizona seeks special action relief from the Superior Court’s order granting real party in interest Michael Layne special action relief from the Tucson City Court’s denial of his motion to dismiss a charge of driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI). The superior court concluded that the DUI proceeding subjected Layne to double jeopardy in light of the prior suspension of his license under A.R.S. § 28-694. Because this is a matter of statewide importance, relating to legal as opposed to factual issues, University of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Luk v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- State v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.