Legal Opinion
Bryant v. Putnam
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 30, 1995No. 95-103PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andree Layton Roaf, Justice.
Appellant William E. Bryant, Jr., seeks reversal of a summary judgment dismissing his action against Appellees Ted and Karen Putnam, for injuries he suffered when he was bitten by dogs owned by the Putnams’ tenant. Appellees appeal the denial of A.R.C.P. Rule 11 sanctions. We affirm both the granting of the summary judgment and the denial of Rule 11 sanctions.
Appellees own a rental house in Conway, which they leased to Mona Jones. Appellant was attacked and injured by Ms. Jones’ rottweiler and pit bull dogs, while he was walking on a street adjacent to the rental…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wyatt v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Reynolds v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Bartley v. SweetserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Ward v. Dapper Dan Cleaners and Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Driggers v. LockeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Van DeVeer v. RTJ, INC.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Tivoli Corp. v. Jewelers Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Allison Ex Rel. Fox v. PageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- PPI Technology Services, L.P. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.