Legal Opinion

Tivoli Corp. v. Jewelers Mutual Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 10, 1996No. 04-95-00135-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUTTS, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Tivoli Corporation (Tivoli) and Walter Franklin Goldman (Goldman) appeal from the summary judgments granted in favor of defendants, Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company (Jewelers) and Wiggins & Company (Wiggins). We affirm.

This suit arose from the insurance company’s denial of coverage of loss of jewelry. Tivoli purchased an insurance policy from Jewelers to cover jewelry and precious stones, with Goldman, the sole owner and president, signing the contract. It is undisputed that the policy was in effect at the time of the claimed loss of jewelry and that the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lundstrom v. United Services Automobile Ass'n-CIC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  3. May v. Nacogdoches Memorial Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2001
  4. Perrotta v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  5. Milam v. National Insurance Crime Bureau, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API