Legal Opinion

Driggers v. Locke

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 1996No. 95-598PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Bob Driggers, the appellant, sued Buddy Neal and Ken and Louann Locke for damages resulting from an automobile accident which occurred at an intersection in Arkadelphia. The record reveals that Mr. Driggers was unable to serve Buddy Neal, the driver of the other vehicle. The allegation against the Lockes was that holly bushes growing on their property at the intersection so impaired motorists’ ability to see oncoming vehicles as to be a cause of the accident. The Lockes denied liability and moved for summary judgment which was entered in their favor. Mr. Driggers took a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fassett v. Delta Kappa EpsilonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Harvey v. HansenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Hamric v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Renfro v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. State Office of Child Support Enforcement v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Whitt v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc. v. Advanced Control Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Bevans v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API