Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Hugh Evans & Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1941No. L. A. 16969, 16970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

These actions have been consolidated for hearing on appeal. In each there are two appeals by separate groups of third party claimants from a single judgment de termining that title to the funds in controversy rests in the plaintiffs and not in the appellants. In action number 16,970 there is also an appeal from an order striking motions for new trial.

Diversified Real Estate Investments and Diversified Real Estate Investments Trust No. 2 are unincorporated business or Massachusetts trusts. They were organized in 1928 and 1929, respectively, by the recordation of like trust agreements…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Anderson v. DerrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Nighbert v. First National Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Wilson v. DunbarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Watwood v. SteurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Portico Management Group, LLC v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Lawler v. SolusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Carolina Lanes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API