Legal Opinion
Watwood v. Steur
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1949No. Civ. 13762PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The appellants’ statement of the facts is concise and accurate, so far as it goes, and is, in part, as follows (App. Op. Br. p. 2) :
“On September 17, 1946, the plaintiff’s assignor obtained a judgment by default against the defendants Jacob Steur and Marie Steur for the sum of $115,273.80. An execution was issued on said judgment, and pursuant to instructions from plaintiff’s counsel, the Sheriff levied upon a safe deposit box at the Day and Night Branch of the Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, which stood in the name of Marie Brouwer, the maiden name of the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schirmer Stevedoring Co., Ltd. v. Seaboard Stevedoring Corp., Brady Hamilton Stevedore Co., Williams, Dimond & Co., N. J. Goulandris, Ltd., Financiera Peruana, S.A. v. Seaboard Stevedoring Corporation, N. J. Goulandris, Ltd. v. Marine Chartering Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Schirmer Stevedoring Co. v. Seaboard Stevedoring Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Turner v. EversAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1973
- Turner v. EversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.