Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Dunbar

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1939No. Civ. 2457PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order vacating and striking from the records a previous order granting a new trial on the issue raised by the filing of a third party claim.

On March 31, 1936, the plaintiff brought an action upon a promissory note against the defendant, Owen L. Dunbar. An attachment was issued and levied upon an automobile which was registered in the name of the defendant. The defendant defaulted and judgment was entered against him on May 21, 1936. On April 15, 1936, Guy Dunbar filed a third party claim, claiming to be the owner of this automobile. After a hearing, properly noticed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Spiegelman v. BowlusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Nelson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawler v. SolusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Jensen v. Hugh Evans & Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Dingwall v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API