Legal Opinion
Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Carolina Lanes, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1995No. B072262PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Carolina Lanes, Inc. (Lanes or judgment debtor) appeals an order denying its motion to vacate and quash a writ of execution obtained by judgment creditor Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Regency or judgment creditor).
Carolina Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises or sublessee) appeals an order denying its third party claim which asserted a sublessee interest in the subject real property.
The issues presented are whether: Lanes was entitled to have the writ of execution quashed on the ground Regency had not obtained the lessor’s consent to a levy on Lanes’s leasehold interest; and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Howard v. County of AmadorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Tisher v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Locke v. Warner Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Citizens for Positive Growth & Preservation v. City of Sacramento CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- City of South Pasadena v. Public Employment etc. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Dickson v. MannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.