Legal Opinion

Harris v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1959No. 460PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The pleadings placed the burden on plaintiffs to establish ownership of the land in controversy.

The stipulations and evidence suffice to establish: Amelia Whitaker and other members of the Whitaker family, on 14 October 1873, conveyed to W. H. Morgan a parcel of land “designated as Lots 45, 46, and 47 on said (San Domingo) map fronting on Butler Street or Avenue, adjoining the lands of Tom Johnson and Solomon Taylor and containing about one and one-quarter acres”; a map of San Domingo, prepared for the Whitaker estate showing a subdivision into lots and named streets was duly recorded in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Euliss v. . McAdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Batson v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Plemmons v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Day v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Carney v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Green v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Allen v. CatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API