Legal Opinion

Day v. Godwin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1963No. 99PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The consolidated judgment dismissed the plaintiff’s three actions because of his failure to prove title to any of the lands described in his pleadings. In actions involving land, a denial places upon the claimant the burden of establishing his title by one of the methods recognized by law. Mobley v. Griffin, 104 N.C. 112, 10 S.E. 142; Paper Co. v. Cedar Works, 239 N.C. 627, 80 S.E. 2d 665; Meeker v. Wheeler, 236 N.C. 172, 72 S.E. 2d 214; Keen v Parker, 217 N.C. 378, 8 S.E. 2d 209.

In these cases the plaintiff stipulated that his title had its source in Grant No. 732 for 78,115 acres issued by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Batson v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. RESORT DEVELOPMENT CO. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Allen v. Conservative Hunting ClubCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Campbell v. MayberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API