Legal Opinion

Plemmons v. Cutshall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1951No. 111PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

It is apparent from the record and statement of case on this appeal that in the trial court there was a misconception on all hands as to the issues raised by the pleadings.

A reading of the petition reveals the express purpose of the proceeding to be the establishment of boundary lines between lands of petitioners and lands of respondents. Chapter 38 of General Statutes of North Carolina. Petitioners allege that they are the owners of a tract of land whose boundaries are the boundaries of lands they allege are owned by respondents.

Also a perusal of the answers shows that respondents admit that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Brown v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Cornelison v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Hill v. Dalton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Nesbitt v. Fairview Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Pruden v. KeemerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Town of Sparta v. HammCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Cherry v. Roanoke Tobacco Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API