Batson v. Bell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Plaintiffs trace title to a grant to Jessie W. Batson for 51 acres dated 20 April 1859. Determinative of the appeal is this question: Have plaintiffs offered any evidence which will permit a jury to find that the disputed area lies within the boundaries of the Batson grant?
The rules applicable to the ascertainment of boundaries -trace back to the early history of the State. They are firmly established by numerous consistent decisions.
What are the boundaries is a matter of law to -be determined by the court from the description .set 'Out in the -conveyance. Where those boundaries may be…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cherry v. Slade's AdministratorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1819
- Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Den Ex Dem. Harry v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
- Doe on Dem. of Tatem v. PaineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
- WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Chappell v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Bishop v. ReinholdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Day v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.