Legal Opinion

Batson v. Bell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1959No. 176PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Plaintiffs trace title to a grant to Jessie W. Batson for 51 acres dated 20 April 1859. Determinative of the appeal is this question: Have plaintiffs offered any evidence which will permit a jury to find that the disputed area lies within the boundaries of the Batson grant?

The rules applicable to the ascertainment of boundaries -trace back to the early history of the State. They are firmly established by numerous consistent decisions.

What are the boundaries is a matter of law to -be determined by the court from the description .set 'Out in the -conveyance. Where those boundaries may be…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cherry v. Slade's AdministratorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1819
  2. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Den Ex Dem. Harry v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  4. Doe on Dem. of Tatem v. PaineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
  5. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Chappell v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Bishop v. ReinholdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Day v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API