Legal Opinion

Allstate Sales & Leasing Co. v. Geis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 15, 1987No. C9-87-473PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Respondent Allstate Sales and Leasing, Inc., (“Allstate”) sued appellants, its ex-employees, to recover commissions it claims were improperly paid. This appeal is from a temporary injunction restraining appellants from spending the commissions and requiring them to deposit the amount at issue with the trial court as security for a potential judgment. We reverse those portions of the temporary injunction.

FACTS

Allstate operates a truck dealership in South St. Paul. Until the fall of 1986, appellants were employees of Allstate: Geis was its general manager, Tradup was its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Miller v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Shaffer v. Brooklyn Park Garden ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Swigerd v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Wenzel v. MathiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. GM GOLD & DIAMONDS LP v. Fabrege Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
  4. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Angeion Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Finnegan v. SunTrust MortgageDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API