GM GOLD & DIAMONDS LP v. Fabrege Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
MILLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is plaintiffs ex parte application for a writ of attachment and motion for entry onto defendants’ property to enforce the writ. See Dkt. 3. After considering the plaintiffs application and motion, the evidence presented at the oral hearing, and the relevant law, the court finds that plaintiffs application and motion should be DENIED.
I. Factual background
In its complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants Fabrege Co., Inc. and Uriel Rubinov, both citizens of the state of New York, purchased a substantial quantity of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rose v. HimelySupreme Court of the United States · 1808
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aequitas Enters., LLC v. Interstate Investment Group, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- 16 Front Street LLC v. Mississippi Silicon, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2016
- Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Corporate Commission of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians v. Money Centers of America, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Crum v. Blixseth (In Re Big Springs Realty LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.