Legal Opinion
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 24, 1986No. 85 Civ. 4163 (MEL)PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Defendant Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b) to dismiss the complaint in this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for failure to plead the fraud claims with sufficient particularity. For the reasons explained below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I
The present action arises out of the complex of facts which formed the basis of a previous litigation before this court, Wichita Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Comark, 586 F.Supp. 940 (S.D.N.Y.). In…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In Re Energy Systems Equipment Leasing Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Eaves v. Designs for Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa NostraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Goldman v. McMahan, Brafman, Morgan & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.