Legal Opinion
Lamberton v. Shalala
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 7, 1994No. CV 91-609 TUC JMRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
ROLL, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs are members of a class who have been or are being denied Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) benefits because their ownership interest in a single motor vehicle exceeds the maximum allowable limit. This action challenges the validity of 45 C.F.R. § 233.20(a)(3)(i)(B)(2) which restricts to $1500 the equity value a household may have in an automobile. Named as defendants are Donna Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), and Charles E. Cowan, Director, Department of Economic Security (“DES”). 1 Class…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Hazard v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Frederick v. ShalalaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994
- Hazard v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Noble v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.