Legal Opinion
Frederick v. Shalala
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 1, 1994No. 6:94-cv-06364PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Elaine Frederick, has applied for and been denied benefits under the Ad to Families -with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) program. The reason for the denial was that she has equity in a car appraised at $4000 and both federal and state regulations provide that AFDC recipients may have no more than $1500 equity in a vehicle. Plaintiff commenced this action seeking a declaration that those regulations, 45 C.F.R. § 233.-20(a)(3)(i)(B)(2) and 18 N.Y.C.R.R. § 352.-23(b)(2), are unlawful, and enjoining defendants from relying on those regulations…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Ford v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Hazard v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Hazard v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Brown v. SHHSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995