Legal Opinion

Hazard v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1995No. Nos. 93-6214, 93-6260PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

This appeal involves a challenge to the $1500 “automobile resource exemption” set by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”), for recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”). See 45 C.F.R. § 233.20(a)(3)(i)(B)(2) (1993).1 Plaintiffs in this case were all denied AFDC and/or Medicaid benefits solely because they each own a vehicle worth more than $1500. Plaintiffs challenged both the Secretary’s initial decision to set the automobile resource exemption at $1500 as well as her subsequent failure to adjust that figure…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. National Welfare Rights Organization v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Philadelphia Citizens in Action v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Markva v. HavemanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. Allegheny County Institution District v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Hazard v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. Beeker v. OlszewskiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  5. Linda Lewis v. Tommy G. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API