Legal Opinion
Miller & Lux, Inc. v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 9, 1932No. Docket No. 761PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAMBERT, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment granting a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff and intervener. The action was brought by plaintiff and respondent to enforce by injunction the terms of a contract executed some twenty years previously by plaintiff and respondent and the predecessors in interest of appellant and of intervener and respondent, and to quiet the title of respondents to the waters of the San Joaquin River and some of its tributaries, particularly the North Fork thereof, as against the appellant. The contract which involved the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Winklemen v. SidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Helms Bakeries v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Benane v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.