Legal Opinion
McMullen v. City of Del City
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 19, 1996No. 86571PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARL B. JONES, Presiding Judge:
Appellant sued Appellee municipality alleging the city’s “agents, servants, and employees have engaged in intentional and willful conduct towards the Plaintiff with the intent of causing her emotional distress.” After taking Appellant’s deposition, Appellee filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that its employees, whatever they had done, had not been acting within the scope of their employment. The trial court granted the motion and this appeal followed.
The undisputed “facts” recited in Appel-lee’s motion for summary judgment were (1)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Runyon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Spirgis v. Circle K Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Eddy v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Breeden v. League Services Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- GOWENS v. BARSTOWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Fehring v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Tanique, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics & Dangerous DrugsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- SHAW v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.