Legal Opinion
Tanique, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics & Dangerous Drugs
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 31, 2004No. 99,091PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JOHN F. REIF, Presiding Judge.
1 This appeal arises from a suit in which Tanique, Inc., and its employee, Rob Collings, allege that state law enforcement agents violated the plaintiffs' civil rights and committed various torts in obtaining and serving a search warrant for the business premises of Tanique, Inc. The plaintiffs' claims were largely based on (1) alleged falsehoods in the affidavit for search warrant, (2) alleged false statements made by the agents to customers of Tanique, Inc., and the news media concerning the products seized from the business premises of Tanique, Inc.,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- United States v. James S. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- NELSON v. AMERICAN HOMETOWN PUBLISHING, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- SHAW v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- White v. City of Del CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- GJA v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- BATES v. P.C. CASTCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.