Legal Opinion

State v. C.J.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2003No. 71867-9PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

The three divisions of the Court of Appeals are divided over the issue presented in this case: whether the State must establish the testimonial competence of a child declarant at the time his or her statements were made to gain admission of those statements under RCW 9A-.44.120 where the child declarant is later deemed incompetent to testify at trial. There is a distinction between unavailability as a witness at trial and the requirements of RCW 9A.44.120 for admission of a child’s out-of-court statement. We hold that the proponent of a hearsay statement from a child abuse victim who is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. COBRA ROOFING SERVICE, INC. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API