Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Russell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1961No. 308PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The appellant purports to present twelve assignments of error, each based on a single exception set out in his notice of appeal as follows: “To the foregoing judgment and each finding of fact incorporated therein; each conclusion of law incorporated therein, and each order, adjudication and decree incorporated therein, the respondent Edward L. Russell objects and excepts (EXCEPTION #1) * *

No exception appears in the record to any finding of fact or conclusion of law except as noted in the notice of appeal and under the assignments of error. Each of the twelve assignments of error purports to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Putnam v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Jamison v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. MacKay v. McIntoshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Dealers Specialties, Inc. v. Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. BurellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. King v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Lancaster v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API