Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 715DC506PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

In the record on appeal, the evidence is presented in question and answer form. This is in violation of Rule 19(d) of the Eules of Practice in the Court of Appeals which requires that the evidence shall be in narrative form, except that a question and answer, or a series of them, may be set out when the subject of a particular exception. This rule further provides that the court, in its discretion, may hear the appeal, dismiss it, or remand it for a settlement of the case on appeal to conform to the rule. State v. Thigpen, 10 N.C. App. 88, 178 S.E. 2d 6 (1970).

Furthermore,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Hunt v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Hines v. FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Dalenko v. CollierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Redevelopment Commission of the City of Greenville v. Unco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. DarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API