Legal Opinion

Willmar Gas Co. Inc. v. Duininck

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1953No. 35,918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.

After a trial resulting in a verdict for plaintiff, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On appeal, we reversed. Willmar Gas Co. Inc. v. Duininck, 236 Minn. 499, 53 N. W. (2d) 225. Thereafter, defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied, and this appeal is from the order denying such motion. The facts are sufficiently stated in our former opinion and will not be repeated here except insofar as it is essential to a determination of the questions now presented.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. Portland Gas & Coke Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Forseth v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Sundberg v. GoarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Erickson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Willmar Gas Co. Inc. v. DuininckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Boland v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Pioneer Natural Gas Co. v. K & M PAVING CO.Texas Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API