Sundberg v. Goar
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Separate appeals: (1) by Charles F. Peterson from an ex parte order of the district court for Kittson county, Watts, J., making him a party defendant in th'e action; and (2) by the original defendants, M. A. Goar, and others, from said order and from a subsequent order of Grindeland, J., refusing to vacate such ex parte order and permitting plaintiff to amend his complaint. Appeal of Peterson dismissed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was commenced in February, 1900, to recover upon a bond alleged to have been executed by defendants to secure the faithful performance by defendant Goar of his duties in the matter of winding up the affairs of a copartnership. The cause of action accrued some time in 1894, but the action was not commenced until the date stated in 1900. The complaint is in the usual form, and sets up the execution of the bond by defendants (Goar as principal and the other defendants *145as sureties), default in its condition's, and demands judgment for the amount therein stated. Defendants interposed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Norris v. District Court First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Bailey v. MerrittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- Spelman v. TalbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Davison v. HarmonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Johnson v. LoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- In Re Trust Created by Will of EngerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- State v. TupaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.