Legal Opinion
Meagher v. Kavli
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 12, 1959No. 37,646PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
This action brought to recover an unpaid balance of attorneys’ fees is before this court for the second time. The facts are exhaustively set forth in the opinion on the prior appeal. Meagher v. Kavli, 251 Minn. 477, 88 N. W. (2d) 871. In the course of the present opinion we shall restate only such basic facts as are necessary for a discussion of the issues.
The attorneys’ fees in dispute are for legal services performed by plaintiffs’ law firm in representing two brothers, A. C. Kavli and E. L. Kavli, in a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Hardy v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. v. Rosholt, Robertson & TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.