People v. Stevens
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an interlocutory appeal arising from a circuit court’s pretrial evidentiary ruling in a murder case. The defendant acknowledged his guilt during plea discussions that arose from proceedings pursuant to an investigative subpoena. The contemplated plea was never entered, and the question then arose whether his statements would be excluded at trial under MRE 410. The circuit court concluded that rule applied, but that the defendant had waived its protections, though the court limited use of most of the disputed evidence to rebuttal only. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
The prosecutor has…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HintonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- People v. FarquharsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Farley v. CarpMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. SmartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- United States v. NewbertDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.